<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Simulation on Dr. Scott Spencer</title>
    <link>https://ssp3nc3r.github.io/categories/simulation/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Simulation on Dr. Scott Spencer</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 15:01:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://ssp3nc3r.github.io/categories/simulation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Four million World Cups before the first whistle</title>
      <link>https://ssp3nc3r.github.io/post/four-million-world-cups/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://ssp3nc3r.github.io/post/four-million-world-cups/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The 2026 World Cup kicks off today. I simulated the whole tournament four&#xA;million times &amp;mdash; and unlike most forecasts you&amp;rsquo;ll read this week, mine tells&#xA;you how sure it is.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;h2 id=&#34;the-number-everyone-publishes-and-the-number-almost-nobody-does&#34;&gt;The number everyone publishes, and the number almost nobody does&lt;/h2&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Every World Cup forecast gives you a number: &lt;em&gt;Spain 18%&lt;/em&gt;. Useful, but it&#xA;hides a question that matters just as much: &lt;strong&gt;how well do we actually know&#xA;that number?&lt;/strong&gt; A model that has watched a player&amp;rsquo;s whole career should be&#xA;more confident than one squinting at six months of form. A squad full of&#xA;household names playing in well-measured leagues should carry tighter&#xA;uncertainty than one whose players we&amp;rsquo;ve barely observed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
