Becoming an expert in storytelling with data requires practicing. Indeed,
Learners need to practice, to imitate well, to be highly motivated, and to have the ability to see likenesses between dissimilar things in [domains ranging from creative writing to mathematics] (Gaut 2014).
For practice, students are assigned four individual homeworks, three of which relate to data graphics, and one relates to written communication. Further, students become members of groups that collectively write a proposal to a chief analytics officer, create an interactive communication for a marketing executive, and present the demonstrated value of their work to a chief executive officer. The progression and grade weighting for each exercise follow:
Class discussions are an important component of learning from one another. To facilitate these, we will discuss topics during class. Along with dialogue during class, we will collectively learn through polls and online discussions. All these forms of participation earn you grade points.
Discussions are not meant to be an end, but a beginning, giving students hand-selected, seminal and cutting-edge references to read and study for the concepts discussed. Go down these rabbit holes, following citations and studying the discussed material. Of note: most of the references are available free on an identified website and/or on Columbia University Library, CLIO — use our library 🤓! For references not available, I will upload a pdf/html file.
Lectures with discussion
Course overview: data analyses, visualization, narrative. May 24
In our first discussion, we will learn about our collective background and experiences. Then, we will introduce course objectives, structure, deliverables, and tools. Finally, we will consider benefits of storytelling and communication in applied analytics, and briefly introduce workflow and software (e.g., R and Python) for the visualization component of the course.
Before your first class, get yourself familiar with the course website, begin to setup your computing environment. Read (Spencer 2021, secs. 1–1.2.2). Say hello on Ed Discussion.
Supplemental resources
Data types; coordinates; visual encodings; grammar of graphics. May 31
Data visualization is the presentation of data as graphical encodings. In this discussion, we will introduce a purpose for data visuals. Then, we consider various components and ways of thinking about their construction, including use of coordinate systems, data encodings, the grammar of graphics. Once we consider the basics of these components, we will practice identifying and using them while exploring data related to our class example case study.
Read Spencer (2021), Sec. 2-2.1.2.3 to become familiar with visual variables and the grammar of graphics, and Wickham, Navarro, and Lin (2021) Sec. 1.2 and 13 to become familiar with the underlying components of a graphic. If you have not already, start working to understand the code I gave you in homework one (remember, you should be learning from my code, not merely answering questions).
Supplemental resources
Encoding with color; design principles; comparing encoded data. Jun 7
Continuing our discussion on visual channels for encoding, this session we will focus on three channels of color: hue, chroma (saturation), and luminance. Then, we consider empirical studies on the effectiveness in using encodings and their limitations. Third, we will consider elements of design we can use for our data graphics. Finally, we will practice these concepts.
Read Spencer (2021), § 2.1.3.1 - 2.2.4 for an overview of the material; Heer and Bostock (2010) (find it in Clio) to understand one way we can empirically test the effectiveness of a graphical decoding and comparison and to learn what kinds of encodings have less error in decoding; and Edward R. Tufte (2001b) for understanding how to experiment with graphics to improve our communications.
Supplemental resources
So far, we’ve been concerned with understanding tools and language for mapping or encoding data to visual channels of graphics. In this discussion, we’ll begin to shift our focus from exploring data with graphics to explaining those graphics. Specifically, we consider our audience in redesigning exploratory graphics for purposes of communication, discuss how to address complexity of graphics for an audience, and begin to more substantially consider graphics as driving a narrative. We’ll begin with annotating graphics, and creating a hierarchy of information.
Read Spencer (2021), § 1.4.1, 1.4.4-1.4.5, 2.1.4 for an overview of the material; Doumont (2009c) for understanding the fundamentals of all modes of communication; and Lupi (2015) to gain an information designer’s perspective on how information is layered to form a complete narrative.
Supplemental resources
Elements of writing. Jun 21
Annotated graphics sometimes stand-alone. But graphics can also benefit from, and add value to, written narrative. Here, we will explore elements of writing, work through example memos as a means of communicating an idea for a data analytics project to an analytics executive. As a group exercise, we will revise an analytics proposal writeup for a new audience.
Read Spencer (2021), § 1.1-1.3 for an overview; Sharot (2017a) to understand what factors or circumstances change audience’s minds, and consider how her insights relate to Doumont’s advice to begin communications by finding “common ground”; Storr (2020a) to understand how we might follow Doumont’s advice to “get our audience to pay attention…”; Booth et al. (2016) to improve how we structure each sentence and paragraph; Zetlin (2017) to categorically understand our first audience: analytics executives.
Supplemental resources
Numeracy in narratives; composition and layout. Jun 28
In a multimodal document, tables and data-driven graphics can add context and illustrate the text, and vice versa. Here, we begin to draw from prior discussions in both data graphics and written narrative. We will consider how to apply visual design to a multi-component document containing text and data, and integrate text and visual information.
We will discuss how layout design and typography can work together to integrate visuals with narrative content, and will enable a deeper exploration of data-driven visual design.
Read Spencer (2021), § 1.4 for an overview; J. E. Miller (2007) to consider design of tables; Edward R. Tufte (2001a) for integrating data visuals and tables with narratives; and skim Butterick (2018) to become aware of what typographic choices influence readability (ergo, attention and understanding) for our audiences.
Supplemental resources
Effective business writing with audience analysis. Jul 5
We will continue discussing the elements of effective business writing for a particular audience and purpose, and learn about the role of revision and getting feedback on your writing.
Read Spencer (2021), § 1.2-1.3 for an overview; Graff, Birkenstein, and Gillen (2021) to learn to place your data communication in the context of previous work and give yours purpose; Doumont (2009b) for another perspective on how to structure business documents.
Supplemental resources
Communicating context, uncertainty, and variation. Jul 12
We’ve discussed the importance of comparison and context, whether communicating with words, visual encodings of data, or both. We’ll discuss combining graphics together and within a larger narrative to communicate context, uncertainty, and variation.
Read Spencer (2021), § 2.4 for an overview; Nolan and Stoudt (2021c) for describing statistical concepts; explore examples from the R package Kay (2021) for various choices in visually communicating uncertainty; and Lupi (2016) to expand upon the importance of context for data.
Supplemental resources
Foundations of interactive design. Jul 19
In our discussion, we consider the foundations of modern user interaction in the context of data-driven, visuals and narratives. Such interactions may include scrolling, overview, zoom, filter, details-on-demand, relation, history, extraction; brushing and linking; hovering; clicking; selecting; and gestures. Part of allowing interaction results in authors having less control over the intended narrative and, thus, may think about interaction as giving the audience some level of co-creation in the narrative.
Read Spencer (2021), § 3-3.1 for an overview; explore Hohman et al. (2020) for best practice examples in communicating with interactivity; Tominski and Schumann (2020), § 4-4.1 to understand interactivity.
Supplemental resources
Interactivity is inherently technology dependent. We discuss modern approaches to interactivity as related to data-driven, visual graphics and narratives. As such, we will introduce a modern technology stack that includes html
, css
, svg
, and javascript
, within which technologies like d3.js
(a javascript library) and processing
operate. Most award-winning interactive graphics, especially from leading news organizations, use this stack.
But we can enable interactivity through interfaces, too, from R
and Python
interactive and markdown notebooks and code, to htmlwidgets
, Shiny
, and plotly
. Then, we have drag-and-drop alternatives like Lyra2
or Tableau
. While Tableau
is functionally much more limited, a use-case for Tableau may be, for example, when a client has a license for it, wants basic interactivity for someone else to setup the visual with interactive options. The range of tools is becoming ever larger. More generally, knowing a range of tools will help us not only build our own interactive graphics, but will also help us work with specialists of these technologies.
From our discussions of the principles and tools of interactivity with data graphics, and ways we can give them organization, we begin considering how to include these tools and concepts to guide our audience in our communications. How should be think about organizing interactive graphics? Would a “dashboard” or “scrollytelling” be useful? Does it depend on our audience and their goals? How should we guide our readers both through the graphics and in their use of interactivity? Consider the ideas and examples from our readings.
Read Spencer (2021), § 3.2-3.3 for an overview; explore Gohel and Skintzos (2021) for extending the grammar of graphics interactively; explore the various types of interactive, visualization tools in the table of tools of our topical resources; review McKenna et al. (2017) for an understanding on factors that can shape the flow of your data-driven stories.
Supplemental resources
Pacing and animation, interactive docs, story. Aug 2
In this lecture, we’ll continue discussing interactive communication. First, we’ll peek inside the tech of scrollytelling as a form of communication. Then, we’ll consider how animation and pacing can help our audiences follow our messages. Finally, we will dig into approaches to creating an interactive story.
Read Spencer (2021), § 3.3, 4-4.1 for an overview; review Nolan and Stoudt (2021b) for ideas on how to begin composing a data story; watch Chu (2016) for thoughts about how animation and pacing can help our audiences follow our stories.
Supplemental resources
User-centered, content design; multi-modal presentations. Aug 9
Now, for the last few weeks, we’ve been working hard to learn an entire stack of technologies that, taken together, enable interactivity in our communications. And this builds on all the best practices we’ve already been diligently practicing. I’m certain that the last few weeks has been a challenge to become more proficient with these tools, and that’s made it an accomplishment just to get these things working, much more putting them to use in communications.
In this discussion, we will consider how to help one another through user-centered, content design, and pairwise prototyping. Finally, we will wrap by considering some ideas on how we combine verbal with the data visual: think multi-modal presentations.
Read Spencer (2021) § 4.2 for an overview; skim J. Schwabish (2016) for ideas on preparing, creating, and delivering presentations. Compare similarities and differences in style, audience, and usage of slides and visuals as described in J. Schwabish (2016) (practiced here) with those created and presented in this course, those created and presented by Lisa Charlotte Muth, and those by Nadieh Bremer.
Supplemental resources
Academic Integrity
Columbia University expects its students to act with honesty and propriety at all times and to respect the rights of others. It is fundamental University policy that academic dishonesty in any guise or personal conduct of any sort that disrupts the life of the University or denigrates or endangers members of the University community is unacceptable and will be dealt with severely. It is essential to the academic integrity and vitality of this community that individuals do their own work and properly acknowledge the circumstances, ideas, sources, and assistance upon which that work is based. Academic honesty in class assignments and exams is expected of all students at all times.
SPS holds each member of its community responsible for understanding and abiding by the SPS Academic Integrity and Community Standards. You are required to read these standards within the first few days of class. Ignorance of the School’s policy concerning academic dishonesty shall not be a defense in any disciplinary proceedings.
Grading policy
Final grades will be assigned from your overall percentage, calculated as a weighted average of your assignments (individual 40%, group 50%) and participation (10%):
Grade | Precentage |
A+ | [98,100] |
A | [93,98) |
A- | [90,93) |
B+ | [87,90) |
B | [83,87) |
B- | [80,83) |
C+ | [77,80) |
C | [73,77) |
C- | [70,73) |
D | [60,70) |
F | [0,60) |
Late submissions of the homework assignments will be subject to an automatic 10% penalty per day and will not be accepted once the next class discussion begins (as we will typically discuss answers). Late submissions of the final project will not be accepted.
Participation
It is important to attend the lectures and read the readings. Each lecture will assume that you have read and are ready to discuss the week’s readings.
Class participation includes both in-class activities (e.g., through polls and group work) and engagement on the class online discussion. To foster a shared learning experience, all enrolled students are required to submit at least one substantive discussion post per week related to the course readings or lecture material. Thoughtful comments typically exhibit one or more of the following:
- Generalizing from examples in discussion or readings
- Devising examples from general principles discussed or in readings
- Critiques of arguments made in the readings
- Analysis of implications or future directions for work discussed in lecture or readings
- Clarification of some point or detail presented in class
- Insightful questions about the readings or answers to other people’s questions
- Links to web resources or examples that pertain to a lecture or reading
Assignments
Individual practice
Find individual assignments in the menu bar at the top.
Homework 1 — graphics
Homework 2 — graphics
Homework 3 — writing
Homework 4 — graphics
Group project
Find group project deliverables in the menu bar at the top.
Proposal
Interactive communication
Multimodal communication
Office hours
Use our office appointment calendars to schedule a one-on-one with Dr. Spencer and include a message that explains what you’d like to discuss. If no available time works for you, then email us with your reason for our meeting and some available times that work for you.
Albers, Josef. 2006.
Interaction of Color.
Yale University Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/7731665.
Anderson, E. W., K. C. Potter, L. E. Matzen, J. F. Shepherd, G. A. Preston, and C. T. Silva. 2011.
“A User Study of Visualization Effectiveness Using EEG and Cognitive Load.” Computer Graphics Forum 30 (3): 791–800.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2011.01928.x.
Arslan, Engin. 2018.
Learn Javascript with P5.js: Coding for Visual Learners.
New York, NY:
Springer Science+Business Media.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/13252591.
Attardi, Joe. 2020.
Modern CSS: Master the Key Concepts of CSS for Modern Web Development.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/15463107.
Bellamy-Royds, Amelia, Kurt Cagle, and Dudley Storey. 2018.
Using SVG with Css3 and Html5 : Vector Graphics for Web Design.
O’Reilly.
https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/using-svg-with/9781491921968/.
Bertin, Jacques. 2010.
Semiology of Graphics: Diagrams Networks Maps.
Redlands:
ESRI Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/13599355.
Booth, Wayne C, Gregory G Columb, Joseph M Williams, Joseph Bizup, and William T Fitzgerald. 2016.
“Revising Style: Telling Your Story Clearly.” In
The Craft of Research, Fourth.
University of Chicago Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/14295943.
Boronine, Alexei. 2012.
“Color Spaces for Human Beings.” HSLuv.org. March 26, 2012.
https://www.hsluv.org.
Bremer, Nadieh, and Shirley Wu. 2021.
Data Sketches A Journey of Imagination,Exploration, and Beautiful Data Visualizations. Milton, UNITED KINGDOM:
A K Peters/CRC Press.
https://www.datasketch.es.
Butterick, Matthew. 2018.
“Butterick’s Practical Typography.” 2018.
https://practicaltypography.com/.
Chu, Tony. 2016.
“Animation, Pacing, and Exposition.” OpenVis Conf 2016, May 13.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4tB6qyxHJA.
Cleveland, William S, and Robert McGill. 1984.
“Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 79 (387): 531–54.
https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.cul.columbia.edu/stable/2288400?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
———. 1987.
“Graphical Perception: The Visual Decoding of Quantitative Information on Graphical Displays of Data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A 150 (3): 192–229.
https://www-jstor-org.ezproxy.cul.columbia.edu/stable/2981473?pq-origsite=summon&seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.
Correll, Michael, Dominik Moritz, and Jeffrey Heer. 2018. “Value-Suppressing Uncertainty Palettes.” In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ’18, 1–11. Montreal QC, Canada: ACM Press.
Cox, Amanda. 2011.
“Shaping Data for the News.” Presented at the Eyeo
Festival, September 21.
https://vimeo.com/29391942.
Doumont, Jean-Luc. 2009a.
“Effective Oral Presentations.” In
Trees, Maps, and Theorems, 85–119. Effective Communication for Rational Minds.
Principiæ.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/11663244.
———. 2009b.
“Effective Written Documents.” In
Trees, Maps, and Theorems. Effective Communication for Rational Minds.
Principiæ.
http://ssp3nc3r.github.io/comm-course-ds/references/Doumont-2009-effective-written-documents.pdf.
———. 2009c.
“Fundamentals.” In
Trees, Maps, and Theorems. Effective Communication for Rational Minds.
Principiæ.
http://ssp3nc3r.github.io/comm-course-ds/references/Doumont-2009-Fundamentals.pdf.
Drasner, Sarah. 2017.
SVG Animations: From Common UX Implementations to Complex Responsive Animation.
http://site.ebrary.com/id/11363809.
Duckett, Jon. 2011.
HTML & CSS. Design and Build Websites.
Wiley.
https://www.htmlandcssbook.com.
Duckett, Jon, Gilles Ruppert, and Jack Moore. 2014. JavaScript & jQuery: Interactive Front-End Web Development. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley.
Fay, Colin, Vincent Guyader, Sebastien Rochette, and Girard Cervan. 2021.
Engineering Production-Grade Shiny Apps. First edition. R Series.
Boca Raton:
CRC Press.
https://engineering-shiny.org.
Gaut, Berys. 2014.
“Educating for Creativity.” In
The Philosophy of Creativity: New Essays, edited by Elliot Samuel Paul, 265–87.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/10983870.
Gohel, David, and Panagiotis Skintzos. 2021.
Ggiraph: Make ’Ggplot2’ Graphics Interactive. Manual.
https://davidgohel.github.io/ggiraph.
Graff, Gerald, Cathy Birkenstein, and Christopher Gillen. 2021.
“The Data Suggest: Writing in the Sciences.” In
"They Say / I Say": The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, Fifth Edition, 250–68.
New York:
W.W. Norton & Company.
http://ssp3nc3r.github.io/comm-course-ds/references/Graff-and-Birkenstein-2021-The-Data-Suggest-Writing-in-the-Sciences.pdf.
Heer, Jeffrey, and Michael Bostock. 2010.
“Crowdsourcing Graphical Perception: Using Mechanical Turk to Assess Visualization Design.” In
Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 203–12.
https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753357.
Heer, Jeffrey, and Ben Shneiderman. 2012.
“Interactive Dynamics for Visual Analysis: A Taxonomy of Tools That Support the Fluent and Flexible Use of Visualizations.” Queue 10 (2): 30–55.
https://doi.org/10.1145/2133416.2146416.
Hohman, Fred, Matthew Conlen, Jeffrey Heer, and Duen Chau. 2020.
“Communicating with Interactive Articles.” Distill 5 (9): 10.23915/distill.00028.
https://doi.org/10.23915/distill.00028.
Hullman, Jessica, and Andrew Gelman. 2021a.
“Designing for Interactive Exploratory Data Analysis Requires Theories of Graphical Inference.” Harvard Data Science Review, no. 3.3 (July).
https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.3ab8a587.
———. 2021b.
“Challenges in Incorporating Exploratory Data Analysis into Statistical Workflow.” Harvard Data Science Review, no. 3.3 (July).
https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.9d108ee6.
Janert, Philipp K. 2019.
D3 for the Impatient: Interactive Graphics for Programmers and Scientists. First edition.
Sebastopol, CA:
O’Reilly Media, Inc.
https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/d3-for-the/9781492046783/.
Kahneman, Daniel. 2013.
Thinking, Fast and Slow.
Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/9041682.
Kay, Matthew. 2021.
Ggdist: Visualizations of Distributions and Uncertainty. Manual.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3879620.
Kelleher, John D, and Brendan Tierney. 2018.
“What Are Data, and What Is a Data Set?” In
Data Science.
MIT Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/15244606.
Ko, Amy J. 2020.
“Design Methods: What Design Is and How to Do It.” Book. September 2020.
https://faculty.washington.edu/ajko/books/design-methods/.
Koponen, Juuso, and Jonatan Hildén. 2019.
Data Visualization Handbook. First.
Finland:
Aalto Art Books.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/15324564.
Leborg, Christian. 2004.
Visual Grammar.
Princeton Architectural Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/SCSB-8748869.
Loukissas, Yanni A. 2019. All Data Are Local: Thinking Critically in a Data-Driven Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Lupi, Giorgia. 2015.
“The Architecture of a Data Visualization: Multilayered Storytelling Through "Info-spatial" Compositions,” February.
https://medium.com/accurat-studio/the-architecture-of-a-data-visualization-470b807799b4.
———. 2016.
“DATA HUMANISM: The Revolution Will Be Visualized.” Print 70 (3): 76–85.
https://www.printmag.com/post/data-humanism-future-of-data-visualization.
Maynard-Atem, Louise, and Ben Ludford. 2020.
“The Rise of the Data Translator.” Impact 2020 (1): 12–14.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2058802X.2020.1735794.
McKenna, S., N. Henry Riche, B. Lee, J. Boy, and M. Meyer. 2017.
“Visual Narrative Flow: Exploring Factors Shaping Data Visualization Story Reading Experiences.” Computer Graphics Forum 36 (3): 377–87.
https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13195.
Meeks, Elijah. 2018.
D3.js in Action. Second.
Manning.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/13262511.
Meirelles, Isabel. 2013.
Design for Information. An Introduction to the Histories, Theories, and Best Practices Behind Effective Information Visualizations.
Rockport.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/14060225.
Miller, Jane E. 2007.
“Organizing Data in Tables and Charts: Different Criteria for Different Tasks.” Teaching Statistics 29 (3): 98–101.
https://onlinelibrary-wiley-com.ezproxy.cul.columbia.edu/doi/full/10.1111/j.1467-9639.2007.00275.x.
———. 2013a.
“Seven Basic Principles.” In
The Chicago Guide to Writing about Multivariate Analysis, Second edition, 13–33. Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/12494729.
———. 2013b.
The Chicago Guide to Writing about Multivariate Analysis. Second edition. Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and Publishing.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/12494729.
Miller, Joshua B., and Andrew Gelman. 2020a.
“Laplace’s Theories of Cognitive Illusions, Heuristics and Biases.” Statist. Sci. 35 (2): 159–70.
https://doi.org/10.1214/19-STS696.
———. 2020b.
“Rejoinder: Laplace’s Theories of Cognitive Illusions, Heuristics and Biases.” Statist. Sci. 35 (2): 175–77.
https://doi.org/10.1214/20-STS779.
Müller-Brockmann, Josef. 1996.
Grid Systems in Graphic Design. A Visual Communication Manual for Graphic Designers, Typographers, and Three Dimensional Designers.
ARTHUR NIGGLI LTD. https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/10489438.
Munzner, Tamara. 2014. Visualization Analysis and Design. CRC Press.
Murray, Scott. 2017.
Interactive Data Visualization for the Web. Second. An Introduction to Designing with
D3.
O’Reilly.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/13626017.
Nolan, Deborah, and Sara Stoudt. 2021a.
Communicating with Data: The Art of Writing for Data Science. 1st ed.
Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862741.001.0001.
———. 2021b.
“Composing a Story.” In
Communicating with Data: The Art of Writing for Data Science, 1st ed.
Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862741.001.0001.
———. 2021c.
“Taking Care with Statistical Terms.” In
Communicating with Data: The Art of Writing for Data Science, 1st ed., 203–31.
Oxford University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198862741.001.0001.
Rahlf, Thomas. 2019.
Data Visualization with R — 111 Examples.
S.l.:
Springer Nature.
https://link-springer-com.ezproxy.cul.columbia.edu/book/10.1007%2F978-3-030-28444-2.
Reas, Casey, and Ben Fry. 2014.
Processing A Programming Handbook for Visual Designers and Artists. Second.
The MIT Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/11370280.
Richards, Sarah. 2017.
Content Design.
Content Design London. https://contentdesign.london/store/the-content-design-book.
Schneiders, Pascal. 2020.
“What Remains in Mind? Effectiveness and Efficiency of Explainers at Conveying Information.” MaC 8 (1): 218–31.
https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i1.2507.
Schwabish, Jonathan. 2016.
Better Presentations: A Guide for Scholars, Researchers, and Wonks.
Columbia University Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/13250860.
Schwabish, Jonathan A. 2021.
Better Data Visualizations: A Guide for Scholars, Researchers, and Wonks.
New York:
Columbia University Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/15473733.
Sharot, Tali. 2017a.
“Tali Sharot: Intelligent People Have Greater Difficulty Changing Their Beliefs.” Presented at the World
Economic Forum,
Davos-Klosters, Switzerland, February 14.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UkdrZ9d3j6g.
———. 2017b.
“(Priors) Does Evidence Change Beliefs?” In
The Influential Mind. What the Brain Reveals about Our Power to Change Others.
Henry Holt and Company.
https://us.macmillan.com/books/9781250159618/theinfluentialmind.
Shneiderman, B. 1996.
“The Eyes Have It: A Task by Data Type Taxonomy for Information Visualizations.” In
Proceedings 1996 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, 336–43.
Boulder, CO, USA:
IEEE Comput. Soc. Press.
https://doi.org/10.1109/VL.1996.545307.
Sievert, Carson. 2020.
Interactive Web-Based Data Visualization with R, Plotly, and Shiny.
Boca Raton, FL:
CRC Press, Taylor and Francis Group.
https://plotly-r.com.
Spencer, Scott. 2019.
“Approximating the Components of Lupi’s Nobels, No Degrees.” P( ssp3nc3r | Columbian ). March 15, 2019.
https://ssp3nc3r.github.io/post/approximating-the-components-of-lupi-s-nobel-no-degrees/.
———. 2020b.
“HSLuv: An R Package to Convert HSLuv Colorspace to RGB and Hex.” P( ssp3nc3r | Columbian ). March 30, 2020.
https://ssp3nc3r.github.io/post/2020-03-30-hsluv-an-r-package-to-convert-hsluv-colorspace-to-rgb-and-hex/.
Storr, Will. 2020a.
“1.0 Where Does Story Begin? 1.1 Moments of Change; the Control-Seeking Brain. 1.2 Curiosity.” In
Science of Storytelling.
New York, NY:
Abrams Books.
http://ssp3nc3r.github.io/comm-course-ds/references/Storr-2020-story-begin-change-gaps.pdf.
———. 2020b.
Science of Storytelling.
New York, NY:
Abrams Books.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/14924581.
Tominski, Christian, and Heidrun Schumann. 2020.
Interactive Visual Data Analysis. 1st ed.
Boca Raton:
CRC Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/14804802.
Tufte, Edward. 2016.
“The Future of Data Science.” Presented at the Microsoft
Machine Learning &
Data Science Summit,
Seattle, Washington.
https://youtu.be/rHUDJ8RyseQ.
Tufte, Edward R. 2020.
“Smarter Presentations and Shorter Meetings.” In
Seeing with Fresh Eyes: Meaning, Space, Data, Truth, 151–61.
Cheshire, Conn.:
Graphics Press.
https://www.edwardtufte.com/tufte/seeing-with-fresh-eyes.
———. 1997.
Visual Explanations. Images and Quantities, Evidence and Narrative.
Graphics Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/1968062.
———. 2001a.
“Aesthetics and Technique in Data Graphical Design.” In
The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 176–90.
Graphics Press.
http://ssp3nc3r.github.io/comm-course-ds/references/Tufte-2001-Aesthetics-and-Technique-in-Data-Graphical-Design.pdf.
———. 2001b.
“Data-Ink Maximization and Graphical Design.” In
The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, 1–15.
Graphics Press.
http://ssp3nc3r.github.io/comm-course-ds/references/Tufte-2001-Data-Ink-Maximization-and-Graphical-Design.pdf.
———. 2001c.
The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Second.
Graphics Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/195232.
———. 2006.
“The Cognitive Style of PowerPoint: Pitching Out Corrupts Within.” In
Beautiful Evidence.
Graphics Press.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/8838638.
Tversky, Barbara, Julie Bauer Morrison, and Mireille Betrancourt. 2002.
“Animation: Can It Facilitate?” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57 (4): 247–62.
https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.
Vaidyanathan, Ramnath, Yihui Xie, JJ Allaire, Joe Cheng, Carson Sievert, and Kenton Russell. 2020.
Htmlwidgets: HTML Widgets for r. Manual.
https://www.htmlwidgets.org.
Wickham, Hadley. 2010.
“A Layered Grammar of Graphics.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 19 (1): 3–28.
https://doi.org/10.1198/jcgs.2009.07098.
———. n.d.
“Create Elegant Data Visualisations Using the Grammar of Graphics • Ggplot2.” Accessed February 26, 2021.
https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org/.
Wickham, Hadley, Danielle Navarro, and Thomas Lin. 2021.
Ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Third.
Springer.
https://ggplot2-book.org/.
Wilke, C. 2019.
Fundamentals of Data Visualization: A Primer on Making Informative and Compelling Figures. First edition.
Sebastopol, CA:
O’Reilly Media.
https://clauswilke.com/dataviz/.
Wilkinson, Leland. 2005.
The Grammar of Graphics. Second.
Springer.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/7899682.
Yi, Ji Soo, youn ah Kang, John T Stasko, and Julie A Jacko. 2007.
“Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization.” IEEE 13 (6): 1224–31.
https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2007.70515.
Zinsser, William. 2001.
“The Lead and the Ending.” In
On Writing Well, Sixth. The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction.
Harper Resource.
https://clio.columbia.edu/catalog/15513137.